How To Build A Mailserver

Mission - a controversial concept

mission, in particular Christian mission is a controversial concept. With Mission terrible developments in the past, such as forced baptisms also associated intolerance and manipulation. People who speak are missionary traveling are considered intolerant types, as people who "interfere in the internal affairs of other people and cultures" themselves.
That is one side. On the other hand, is that mission (sense of mission) to the essence of the great world religions.



What is meant by mission - what you mean by this?
How justified Christian mission today in the context of criticism and Atheismusdebatte?
How can Christians today make responsible missionary work? What
criticism must be taken seriously - what can Christians learn from the mistakes of the past?


Here is the space to write down what you think about this issue ....
Discuss with and write a comment.

Helpful links:

allianz-mission.de/ueber-uns/umstrittene-mission /

Does The Hymen Look White

Characteristics of the Missional Church


1. A missional church primarily understands the centrality of the gospel (1 Cor. 15:1-4; 2:2; Gal. 6:14). Man was created in the image of God. Adam disobeyed God and his sin has affected all of mankind. Christ's sacrificial atonement is the only way of redemption and reconciliation to God. This alone motivates us to be consumed with the mission of God.
2. A missional church embraces the calling of God to act as a missionary into its own culture (Mt. 4:19; Acts 16:20; 17:6). Its members approach natural relationships, activities, community, and occupation or school as opportunities to influence for the gospel.
3. A missional church acknowledges its purpose is to glorify God by taking Christ into the irreligious world (Mt. 28:18-20). It is not self-absorbed in its own life but rather absorbed in the life-giving mission of Jesus.
4. A missional church boldly and intentionally encounters unbelievers like Christ (Luke 7:34; Acts 16:20; 17:6). Its goal is not separation but redemption without compromised values.
5. A missional church actively seeks to be trained and equipped as a missionary through its gospel community (Eph. 4:11-16). Every member is personally equipped to engage friends and neighbors with the gospel.
6. A missional church is deeply dependent upon the Holy Spirit as an agent for evangelizing the lost world (Acts 1:8; 4:8, 31; 13:9). Lost people are saved by the Holy Spirit when and how He determines.
7. A missional church commits to the authoritative, infallible, inerrant, inspired, all-sufficient Scriptures (2 Timothy 3:14-17; Acts 2:42). The authority of all missionary work is founded in the truth that God has a clear Word to communicate to the world.
8. A missional church develops relationships with the lost for the purpose of incarnating Christ (Matt. 5:13-16). It seeks to intentionally develop meaningful relationships with the numerous acquaintances in their lives.
9. A missional church uses sacrificial love as its means of witness (John 15:12-17; 1 John 4:19-21). Every believer is constrained to practically and sincerely demonstrate extravagant love to non-believers.
10. A missional church helps others to find Jesus in their own way and timing, rather than forcing them to "turn or burn" (1 Cor. 9:20-23). It is the sovereign God who uses us as we humbly relate to other's misperceptions of the gospel.
11. A missional church is affected in every area of its life through a calling by God to be an agent for the gospel (Acts 4:13, 31-35). As the gospel redeems our lives it changes us and challenges us toward God's mission.
12. A missional church practices its faith in community-groups of people together (Acts 2:42-45; Phil. 1:27). It seeks to participate in true community like our triune Godhead.
13. A missional church worships God in an authentic, personal and evangelistic way (John 4:23-24). We worship a Savior who left us here to be captured by His mission.
Scott Thomas
Voller Text im Internet: http://churchresearch.wordpress.com/2008/09/18/missional-church-what-is-it/

Nadine Jansen Play Tennis

re-draw with a "great" Unfortunately

obsolete with today's 1-1 draw with Austria Vienna, the New Town squad after the 1-1 draw against Rapid in the previous round for the second consecutive draw with a "great". (Contrary to Austria had indeed also stored already in the third round with 0-0.) Other than against Rapid, where the SC narrowly won by scraping, but it is now the United Kingdom closer to a three-point than the brave fighting and the first equal half of New Town. Pavel Kostal with his first goal of the season (38th, header from Simkovic-kick) and once again the outstanding Saso Fornezzi were crucial - not to mention Michael Stanislaw, the 74th in the came for Thonhofer: he saved in the 88th on the line.

Kates Playground Zip Set 23

points loss against Rapid

With the score at 1:1 ... A clear penalty denied Sadovic awards alone in front of goal. These two facts hurt. Rapid kidnapped with the best of luck and help from the referee a point from our wonderful Neustadt / stolen.

Postscript: The referee has not seen a lot of other things and do not want to see. Also on our site. Question: Weak eyesight - or always trying to make up for mistakes by the next mistake?

Hair Games And Waxing

The "miss underestimated" President

"I will not give up - and if only Laura and my dog Barney to mic believe h" (GW Bush to Bob Woodward)

Almost two years is it since he and the White House to Barack Obama has passed - and yet George W. Bush, 43 President of the United States of America, always good for lively Bargespräche. And, "excited" is perhaps an understatement: still divides this man and his policies and opinions the controversy surrounding him to be out with a vehemence that surprised. Still you defend him with ideological zeal or hate from my heart or with a similar ideological zeal. What has this to politicians that the spirits can divorce him so wonderful?

When Bush to Texas and moved Obama, the messiah of all "progressive" thinking old Europeans the business of government handed - only to be elected are received, the new president of the Oslo Nobel Academy pardon then an Oscar ... a peace

Nobel Peace Prize - told a correspondent in Echo der Zeit " on Radio DRS 2 (I think it was Erich Gysling): "Anyway, Bush has left traces in his eight years, more than any president before him."

two campaigns (in Afghanistan and Iraq), a reorganization of the complicated world that has become the nineties with the Bush Doctrine ("Either you are with us or against us") and it consequently derived the "Axis of Evil ", which refused to sign the KyotoProtoklls and the subsequent crisis of climate research ... in key issues, all little people at the beginning of the 21st Century employ as has this man apparently left a deep mark.

lack of creative will, you can certainly accuse him of not whether one agrees now with how and where or not the. Even the sharpest critics will acknowledge that. A "lame duck" was not this president.

Is the world after 8 years of George W. Bush a worse or better than before? what lessons we must learn history from 9 / 11 and the way this president has reacted to this? And even with the numerous mistakes made by this president: how serious are they in the long run? Did you also here in Europe in the zero years not sometimes - though perhaps from the ptik Moment and rightly so - about responding?

Thinking about it may be beneficial, especially now, years later. Most of us are very conscious memories of the last decade. And that beacon was at the beginning: the 11th September 2001! As we have seen that, stunned, elementary, with its overwhelming force image has shaped us and everything that is related is related to Bush. Maybe we are therefore less sensitive. We can still be seen in the denial phase and resist us to the world as it actually is.

here is a tentative list of all of the things that Bush may have made but not as bad - or at least brought to an end successfully and consistently - has:

first No new attacks after 9 / 11 on American soil. A dozen planned was foiled.

second No country is home to more terrorists and sponsors or is in serious trouble if it does.

third "The Surge". The object of the Rumsfeld strategy and troop surge in Iraq, which has only brought the peace there.

4th Kyoto: a lot of cheating and one-sided scaremongering of the climate preachers were exposed. They must prove their case better before the economy and jobs wantonly harm.

5th Gleneagles summit billion package for Africa and the fight against AIDS in South Africa.

6th Tax cuts for whole term (about 37 billion dollars, the people had to serve, especially the middle class)

7th "No Child Left Behind" initiative to promote Great reading and writing skills in schools.

8th "Bailout": banks based and thus possibly prevent worse (no domino effect in the crash of large banks)

9th Stem cell research: it has advanced by appropriate legislation.

10th Federal Rich Terer Warning: abortion, gay marriage and drug liberalization of for the time table.

And what do you think? Has the world become a better or worse? As one might have a different response to 9 / 11? Or is Bush the worst president ever since?

My Puppys Butt Is Red And Inflamed

2-1 defeat at LASK

expected the tough match was unfortunately lost 2-1. A huge disappointment because we've all been hoping that our run continues. But even against a crippled opponent, who is absolutely must win, it is often very difficult. Peter Schöttel said before the game that the match has pioneering character. If we win, we play with the top, we lose, we continue to hang around in the midfield. Well, now we know where we belong. But after Wacker Innsbruck has played against Rapid and lost only 1-1 against storm Ried 0:1, the summit is pretty closely, so it's not yet decided where we spend the winter.
The helicopter force was granted it anyway, that it has delivered this little coup.

Cruise Ship Almost Tips Over

"You have to change you" - the downward spiral

The "change" (change from Obama = the battle cry of "progressives") is the battle cry of the modern communists: everything is changing, we must also walk because there are no values in themselves are (and certainly not absolute, since God is dead!) But only individual value concepts in relation to other individual value terms, a system of values pluralism or pluralisms even is such a favorite word of "Change" Rufer. Needless to say that for now the values of others must be informed of those corrupt, Western, late capitalist "society in Europe, because they blamed for everything bad in the world.

This is decadence: if you desperately your values low, but the values of all other - or the other principle - is holding up!

This "change" as a program specifically means the permanent self-abolition of values, freedom, democracy and prosperity made it possible to have , and it is operated by university professors, just as is for politicians, journalists, intellectuals and artists (in which It is virtually the only "content" that they may provide yet).

Sarrazin was not wrong with the title of his book: self-abolition. What "tradition" and traditional knowledge, and above all established structures of cohabitation between People: it's water under the bridge, it is superstition of earlier, under-developed generations, it is degenerate patriarchal, old-fashioned, conservative, racist , selfish, outdated, obsolete.

The goal of these people is an order i n not of the individual is the measure of all the political freedom of thought, is but in the community controlled and planned development. That is measured in the bourgeois world prosperity and freedom on the individual pursuit of happiness, which is only in a free market (not only economic goods but also the skills, lifestyles, values, attitudes, ideas and forms of organization) can realize those people is a thorn in the eye.

you want to create a better world, is the better person. With people who fit the better world, not vice versa. The man is like a piece of furniture in the world better fit. The Socialists have never got it: the world is not better than the people who live in it.

For them, man is only Manipuliermasse: "It is the social conditions that shape the human being, not vice versa" - what a mistake!

The Socialists do not like that at the top of all order the individual - or better: the individuals in their freely chosen associations - must stand. No, they want to install there instead a kind of wise, just, caring country.

invent and therefore constantly seek new "injustices", "oppression", "dependencies" to the individual pursuit of happiness to have in check . Edward Miliband, for example, the new Labour leader says, even publicly, that the concept of free market economy is no longer sacrosanct. One type of socialism is to regulate the coexistence thoroughly because of course the "experts" and "professionals" and officials better in a position to shape the lives of the people.

The problem is that people are just less stupid than the Socialists do this and therefore never will participate in these plans!

She has run persistently justified in many cases in pure cultural self-hatred, self-abolition manifests itself as Max diagnosed correctly, in the modern attitude:
"Change we are not the grievances but adapt the laws and rules in such a way that there are not abuses. "
see what we in the drug policy in the Immigration area in criminal law, in the encounter with radical Muslims, social services, in foreign policy, in divorce law, family policy, the school system - smolder everywhere where social conflicts, or have already broken out and large parts of the political establishment have become too weak and vacillating formulate to (1) principles, (2) clear rules establish, and (3) this also enforce and operate instead Pflästerlipolitik and policy decisions avoided.

A blind man sees that the spiral is downward, thus paving the way for the "Change" Rufer, who have a solution for everything: More government!

And yes, failed with white wine-digging pianists and study dropouts and ego-bulldozers, which are based solely on personal retention of power, elected by a parliament that would like to have a concordant comfort zone but in fact at every opportunity, every sometimes overcomes the other like wild animals - are with those people at the helm of the (still ) Civil foundations of this society seriously at risk.

Back Pain Above Waistline

home win over previously unbeaten league leaders!

Yesterday's 1-0 win over the previously unbeaten league leaders Wacker Innsbruck is in many ways a good thing. Apart from the three points and the glory, which this year bears strong Tyrolean first brought down to have solidified, some newly filled positions at the New Town team. Again Madl provided a defensive midfielder from an impeccable performance. The displaced from this position, Mario Reiter made in the center of defense alongside Kostal Once again, this perfectly as well. It seems for now, coach Schöttel preferred the Christian Ramsey to get. In my view a very good choice of the coach, because riders clearly has benefits and more fun experience to the younger by 3 years Ramsey. The fact that the SC is now the fourth consecutive game without conceding a goal but was still more reasons: Christian Thonhofer, this season on loan from Rapid come, and Andi Schicker, newcomer of the Admiralty, are a significant strengthening of the defensive department. Thonhofer on the right and send them on the left-back are much more than a substitute for Taner Ari and Daniel Dunst and Ronald Gercaliu and Wolfgang Klapf. Substantial support by the team of course, finally, in her excellent goalkeeper Saso Fornezzi who has held back from Innsbruck distinguished one seems safe gate of the Tyrol, the Kopfballaufsitzer of Perstaller in the 76th Minute of the game, has avoided a fine save.
Another notable advantage of yesterday evening football is the relatively high number of viewers. With more than 5,000 spectators, the stadium was so fully than it has been a long time. Although many free tickets were there: This is the right way!

bottom line is to say: If the team continue to bring such attractive benefits, it will surely be possible to get the necessary sponsorship for the survival of the club in the top division. The pressing question is: Will the club leaders manage to hold together this great team? I hope so!