Kavithai In Tamilfor Marriage

At Casanova's footsteps: Tricks of the Stelzmasters

"The woman's legs are the first thing I put aside, if I want to judge their beauty ..."

Giacomo Girolamo Casanova Chevalier de Seingalt
(Italian adventurer and writer, 1725 - 1798)

From he could himself the above-cited Casanova cut by a slice of ... Was on this planet ever courted a lady in higher perfection than we pictured above protagonist in so irresistible, inimitable, relentlessly perfect, often copied but never reached way demonstrates once again?

that we imitate the Grand Master craft than, in its perfection but can never reach, should not worry us. But learn from the master to be allowed the grace is really almost too much ... So let's take the technology of the incomparable little more closely:

Starting with the skillful positioning of the upper body, which at an angle of exactly 45 ° direction of the object of desire is turned. The right arm is supported with a concentrated, but not cramped fist at right angles to the hips. The left arm on the other hand is placed lasciviously loose on the counter: Do not indecent but skilfully provocative ... The whole is rounded off by a casual flick of the counter edge with superb left hand, the rhythm of the increased heart rate, which ultimately form the head, shoulders, arms and hands, a stylish whole.

The picture is not completely clear, yet no less important: the "leg work". While the right leg as tight and firm foothold for the stability and integrity of the Conqueror "is" the left leg is in stark contrast, emphasizes loose beaten on a slight angle, just touching the ground with the foot peaks. This in turn manifests the lightness of being, with which our master consistently impressed with the weaker sex. Détail indispensable: the telecommunications apparatus (preferably recent and noble character) projects there - seemingly random, actually well thought out - clearly visible from the front right pocket.

Last but not least: the eye contact. Note the incredibly loud, but in no way intrusive, but usual casual, charming, seconded by a mischievous smile winning look with which it the grandmaster succeeds apparently playing, the other person to cast a spell. Here is - we have to recognize envy - a 100%-piece professional at work. Let us be grateful to be able to learn from him ...

PS: Small Communiqué on behalf of the Grand Master he has (once again) a new blog opens . Because at present large Stelzaktivitäten the first entry is made but until the new year. In the meantime, he wishes his disciples a happy new year!

How To Clear Herpes On Nose

What does "share of the vote"?

A certain Theddy (?-Bear) makes the following in a comment to my last post account:

"So, about 30% of voters has SVP elected. Voter turnout was about 50%. We had just under 15% of voters who have given the SVP's voice. The number of electors is even smaller than that of the population. As you may have a minor (about 22% of the total population) and foreigners (about 20% of the total population) off. Then would probably about 10% of the population, have chosen the SVP .

Theddy appears occasionally at Emeidi to look over. The latter fact made several months ago similar Zahlenspielchen .

The essence of the above "statement" is that you the voter shares of the parties subtracting the proportion of non-voters and those of non-voters, from which one of the more grotesque it is concluded that, of the SVP almost in spite of a share of the vote 30% 10% represent the popular will. (Analog then the SP would still represent about 7%, which is then not mentioned in the above calculations, surprisingly, ...)

The left computer are incorrect: If is mentioned in connection with elections and voting by the people, then it is of course always meant only that part which one hand on political rights and on the other hand has actually exercise such rights. The (hypothetical) willingness of the other part, has for the assessment of what people will be completely irrelevant or it is fake, that he is actually integrated into the expressed will of people.

that foreigners, incapacitated and have sub-18-year-old is not entitled to representation which is the applicable law and anyone who wants to change that, can get involved in politics accordingly. But as long as this legal status quo is, one can that part of the population not in the concept of 'nation' political Sense subsume. The same applies to the non-voters. Would be even better if non-voters would complain that they have no political representation ...

3rd Birthday Invitation Wording Toy Story

Sami "The Undertaker" Schmid

Ueli Maurer Samuel Schmid at the group meeting, 13.12.2007, shortly before eight:

"78 years was the SVP in the government, thanks to Ruedi Minger, who after years the opposition as the first Federal Council, the voice of young people brought to the Federal Council. And now we have to get out, because you, Sami, on your cushy positions are attached to. Because you only think about you! "

and behold. How can see the Sunday papers , was the catalyst for the adoption of the election by Widmer actually a conversation with Samuel Schmid. (Even if Madame Widmer course it does not admit the most important reason for adopting the choice was of course their own career plans.)

Maurer will nevertheless be true: if Schmid had supported the opposition strategy from the beginning, it would have the Christian Democrats barely Blocher dared to choose. Sami was in this sense, the death knell of the concordance system ...

Can The Flu Bring Your Period On Early

three socially acceptable Untruths to Blocher deselection



enough in this day and age, if a certain statement - and no matter how wrong! - Is simply expressed over and over again, and communicated via media so that the general public this statement at face value, ultimately holds that it has taken root in the collective memory as it were a large part of the population. Many such falsehoods can be heard in connection with the Bloch-selection, so I will try at this point, with some of these trials and tribulations - the worst - a clean up once and for all. Sisyphus says hello ...

untruth 1:


"Why the fuss was also Ruth Metzler in 2003 as a serving member of the Federal . Deselected "

is a fact. 2003 not the person Ruth Metzler voted Rather, they took the party CVP, which then had about 14% share of the vote away their second Federal seat and gave it to the SVP, which at the same could show the time a voter share of 27%. Metzler had to believe in it because their (re) election took place earlier than the more senior Deiss and because they did not have the courage to compete in the next round against Deiss. Had the pale Deiss Metzler offered his seat , Metzler would have been immediately selected. If Blocher was elected last week when Sami Schmid had offered him his seat? Exactly.

falsehood 2:


. The election of Widmer-Schlumpf is nothing unusual, particularly with the SP method was used often in exactly the same as last was chosen as Francis Matthey instead of the official candidate Christiane Brunner.. "

Fact: The non-election by Christiane Brunner, it was to occupy the seat of resigned for health reasons René Felber to new . Brunner was indeed the official SP candidate, but it was - in contrast to Blocher - just not acting Federal Councillor, but a new Candidates. Brunner was elected not , Blocher was elected from . This is a huge difference.

untruth 3

"Eveline Widmer-Schlumpf is a tight bourgeois politician."

to refute this statement, you should look not even bother to take their previous political activity as Graubünden cantonal government under the microscope. name it alone due to its appearance as leftists, however, would be a little in common (though not totally out ...). Pointing out that it is scientifically proven that women on average continue to politicize through the band left than men, could be dismissed as anti-feminist. It is crucial for something completely different: This woman has the most important Role in the political intrigue played that for dismissal of the tight bourgeois (sic) has led Federal Blocher. It thus helped the Wahlverliererin SP , yes it her in the first place, their number one target (a goal, based on which virtually the entire election campaign left at all) to achieve . This is a highly political act Widmer-Schlumpf is dar. An act, which they must bring the rest of her political life against any reasonable explanation in civil emergency.

Ervamatin Hair Lotion Review

thoughts on the Federal election



Blocher is now the era come to an end?

Maybe. I am amazed at myself how much I dig up this colossal wrong decision of the United Federal Assembly in the position. The letter reminds me of something hard - and not just because I'm blog-come comparatively abundant in the final weeks of the exercise.

It'll take me so not bad, that I am not this time to deliver a text with unity of form and matter in the situation. To me very busy the upcoming (government) policy end of the fittest by far and most capable member of our government. In random order so my thoughts on that 12th December 2007 - in fact a " which date will live in infamy " (though one of the Zweitziterte in the aftermath of the attack on Pearl Harbor Roosevelt Quote handed down this morning, probably wanted to use in the opposite manner).

Several questions I currently go through my head:

damn how good it has to go this country if it can afford our Parliament (with impunity) to elect a man of the caliber Blocher?

What the hell has he done wrong in those four years - except that he is simply Blocher? We hear from opponents over and over again the same empty words: his style was unacceptable (a wise man once said, talking about the style you only if one's arguments ...), went out xenophobic racist and he should be (I'm still waiting for those who could provide me even one quote Blocher, which would prove this ...), it violated the separation of powers (although - as in the GPK affair - even from a political left constitutional law professor, the opposite has been assigned), a collegiate, he violated (why can Blocher not know what Comrade Moritz at least the same degree also is doing and what that means exactly in general collegiality?), our core values, he violated (even on 10vor10 heard of Andy " GSoA "Gross) - abstract's the Limit! But what he has done wrong in concrete terms?

Hard facts that make the track record Blocher clearly see the other hand, many of: whom do we owe it that the EU accession of Switzerland has disappeared from the political agenda? Who's the only one in his department spending massively reduced and this without any noticeable performance issues? Federal Council which is even by his political opponents - if often behind closed doors - a huge dossier attesting knowledge? Who we owe it that the most indebted IV not for a year after all, the number of new retirees is increasing? Who initiated the long overdue reorganization of the federal prosecutor? Who was quite simply the most efficient Federal Council? Who else would really like to switch to EDI, the department with the greatest of all political challenges?

The personal experiences on today's election day: large majority of smiling faces, winning smile, malicious comments en masse. At the moment the announcement of the election result this morning I am in the cafeteria full of the UniS before a giant screen: thunderous applause mixed with schadenfreude, a standing ovation. (If the Blocher haters already in the economic and jus-dominated UniS so striking prevail, how must it be in those seconds until the Uni Tobler back and forth to go ...?) I am a little perplexed. For they know not what they do ... In 30 years people will think differently about him because I'm sure.

Lustig also unplayed incredulous looks when assembled in one round, "admits" that one can not just look forward to Blocher's ballot. Apparently I belong to a "target group" which is so named from the "urban" people simply can not believe (want?) That they keep Blocher for a good politician ...

pleasantly surprised I was after all found on the positive words that Zgraggen over in his blog for Blocher and which I can agree with almost all:

"For Blocher was not overthrown because he was not his performance brought has (what should be the normal case ...), but because he was too good, because he was uncomfortable because he criticized others because it called for more transparency and more efficiency, and above all because the problems he mentioned directly by name (in an executive really absolute top quality ...). It was at this Federal election is not about the performance of the various federal councils (which has, for example, Samuel Schmid Micheline Calmy-Rey, or the last 4 years so accomplished ...??), but only to the person Blocher: we wanted this uncomfortable get rid of critics, we wanted to be calm in the Bundesrat;. gladly therefore a harmless local politician from the Grisons "

Who voted for him actually

? The Socialists and the Greens, clearly, that you knew a long time and that is their right. Above all, the CVP, which may be called since no longer bourgeois, their support for women Widmer-Schlumpf never communicated and the latter prefer a Geneva communists left. Finally, the blocherophoben FDP-learning, which in full, would certainly include the usual suspects Christa Markwalder. What Liberals to? "There were more than seven." - said earlier in a TV FDP parliamentarian from the canton of Uri. I suspect it would be a little more. All the more so as the UDC LER Hassler, Gadient and Haller probably not loaded for Blocher have. Furthermore, it should still give some CVP-learning the mind have not yet lost. Those so-called stem from the CVP landing ...

After all, allegations must also respect to the SVP party leaders raise : Was it really necessary to ask the Parliament in such a harsh, ultimate, indeed almost blackmailing tone for re-election Blocher, rather than simply a warm welcome, a confirmation Office to ask? The opposition threat was necessary, yes, but they had to communicate so militant? If they can not simply place discreetly? And it was really necessary, the two uncomfortable Grisons - BR media attention shortly before the elections - from the most important commissions to stage a coup? Would all this have been prevented (and that would certainly not have been so difficult), have only 5 (!) Persons who gave at the end of the eruption between Blocher and Widmer-Schlumpf, probably voted differently ...

And how do we go from now? The last parliamentary elections were plebiscitary on the question of whether one is for or against Blocher. Whether this is good or bad, if that's the fault of the SVP or the debt is their enemy is another matter. All the SVP and a big part of that, the FDP have chosen - ergo at least 40% of the population - thus spoke of a Federal Blocher. They were now discredited and this should not be without politically consistent.

Although I have given up hope now plagues me the following question: what happens if Smurfette, which is currently lerInnen of SP and Green, lerInnen CVP, frets and lubricate mainly media oodles soaped leaves tomorrow kick out the election, contrary to expectations? What is SVP-activist then from the left (and that includes now also the CVP) selected? Or can the Seisler with the mustache (Schwaller) of sweet temptation of power, not resist, should they? Morning at about 09.00 clock, we hopefully know more ...

Period Is 3 Days Away

The plight of the gaze

the years continuing decline of the readership of eye gaze and Sunday - a trend that began long before the advent of free newspapers - with a few words and can be easily justified. Daniela Niederberger in the current world week:

"The leaves [ view and Sonntagsblick ] have it spoiled in recent years with many: the economy, whose exponents were portrayed as the villains of our time, as greedy cheaters and grasshoppers. What with the exception of psychics and spiritual healers Man again advertised in view . With the policy, particularly with the SVP. wirschaftsfeindlichen joy of course had probably only the trade unions and the Social Democrats, but do not read the view. "

fact that the two gaze now will change their stance radically, I venture, however doubtful. As long as the glass of champagne-Sozi and would Frank A. Meyer-intellectuals in the house Ringier is the eminence grise, is a change of course in a sensible political line hardly possible ...